Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 101
Filtrar
1.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 259: 111274, 2024 Mar 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38643529

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Non-fatal overdose is a leading predictor of subsequent fatal overdose. For individuals who are incarcerated, the risk of experiencing an overdose is highest when transitioning from a correctional setting to the community. We assessed if enrollment in jail-based medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is associated with lower risk of non-fatal opioid overdoses after jail release among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study of adults with OUD who were incarcerated in New York City jails and received MOUD or did not receive any MOUD (out-of-treatment) within the last three days before release to the community in 2011-2017. The outcome was the first non-fatal opioid overdose emergency department (ED) visit within 1 year of jail release during 2011-2017. Covariates included demographic, clinical, incarceration-related, and other characteristics. We performed multivariable cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to compare the risk of non-fatal opioid overdose ED visits within 1 year after jail release between groups. RESULTS: MOUD group included 8660 individuals with 17,119 incarcerations; out-of-treatment group included 10,163 individuals with 14,263 incarcerations. Controlling for covariates and accounting for competing risks, in-jail MOUD was associated with lower non-fatal opioid overdose risk within 14 days after jail release (adjusted HR=0.49, 95% confidence interval=0.33-0.74). We found no significant differences 15-28, 29-56, or 57-365 days post-release. CONCLUSION: MOUD group had lower risk of non-fatal opioid overdose immediately after jail release. Wider implementation of MOUD in US jails could potentially reduce post-release overdoses, ED utilization, and associated healthcare costs.

2.
J Subst Use Addict Treat ; 158: 209254, 2024 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38072387

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment with methadone and buprenorphine medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) during incarceration may lead to better community re-entry, but evidence on these relationships have been mixed. We aimed to identify community re-entry patterns and examine the association between in-jail MOUD and a pattern of successful reentry defined by rare occurrence of reincarceration and preventable healthcare utilization. METHODS: Data came from a retrospective, observational cohort study of 6066 adults with opioid use disorder who were incarcerated in New York City jails and released to the community during 2011-14. An outcome was community re-entry patterns identified by sequence analysis of 3-year post-release reincarceration, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. An exposure was receipt of in-jail MOUD versus out-of-treatment (42 % vs. 58 %) for the last 3 days before discharge. The study accounted for differences in baseline demographic, clinical, behavioral, housing, and criminal legal characteristics between in-jail MOUD and out-of-treatment groups via propensity score matching. RESULTS: This study identified five re-entry patterns: stability (64 %), hospitalization (23 %), delayed reincarceration (7 %), immediate reincarceration (4 %), and continuous incarceration (2 %). After addressing confounding, 64 % and 57 % followed the stability pattern among MOUD and out-of-treatment groups who were released from jail in 2011, respectively. In 2012-14, the prevalence of following the stability pattern increased year-by-year while a consistently higher prevalence was observed among those with in-jail MOUD. CONCLUSIONS: Sequence analysis helped define post-release stability based on health and criminal legal system involvement. Receipt of in-jail MOUD was associated with a marker of successful community re-entry.


Asunto(s)
Cárceles Locales , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Análisis de Secuencia
4.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 29(6): 791-801, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37487499

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Paid sick leave (PSL) is a public health strategy associated with benefits for workers, businesses, and consumers. In the absence of a federal law, in 2014, New York City (NYC) joined other state and municipal governments with local PSL policies. OBJECTIVES: To examine changes in PSL after the implementation of NYC's 2014 Paid Safe and Sick Leave Law and to assess which communities remain less likely to use PSL. DESIGN: This study uses data from multiple panels of the NYC Longitudinal Survey of Wellbeing (NYC-LSW)-a population-representative study of NYC adults-to track changes in PSL, using data collected before and after NYC's Paid Safe and Sick Leave Law was implemented. We use weighted cross-tabulations and multinomial logistic regression models to assess changes in payment for sick leave since the implementation of the law. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The study includes 2985 NYC adults aged 18 to 64 years who reported working for pay in the year preceding the survey where PSL questions were asked (2014-2019). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of sick leave and payment for sick leave. RESULTS: Weighted descriptive results show a 7-percentage-point increase ( P = .02) in the rate of being paid for all sick days and a 6-percentage-point decrease ( P = .02) in not being paid for any sick days. Results from multinomial logistic regression models, adjusting for potential confounders, show that after implementation of the law, workers with low levels of education, who are younger, Latino, and foreign-born remain less likely than their peers to use PSL. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that the PSL mandate expanded access for employees but not evenly across groups. These results offer guidance to other jurisdictions implementing PSL policies, suggesting the need for targeted education and enforcement efforts to ensure policies reach sectors where low-wage workers are most prevalent.


Asunto(s)
Salarios y Beneficios , Ausencia por Enfermedad , Adulto , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York , Empleo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
5.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 42(3): 357-365, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36877900

RESUMEN

In July 2021 New York City (NYC) instituted a requirement for all municipal employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19 or undergo weekly testing. The city eliminated the testing option November 1 of that year. We used general linear regression to compare changes in weekly primary vaccination series completion among NYC municipal employees ages 18-64 living in the city and a comparison group of all other NYC residents in this age group during May-December 2021. The rate of change in vaccination prevalence among NYC municipal employees was greater than that of the comparison group only after the testing option was eliminated (employee slope = 12.0; comparison slope = 5.3). Among racial and ethnic groups, the rate of change in vaccination prevalence among municipal employees was higher than the comparison group for Black and White people. The requirements were associated with narrowing the gap in vaccination prevalence between municipal employees and the comparison group overall and between Black municipal employees and employees from other racial and ethnic groups. Workplace requirements are a promising strategy for increasing vaccination among adults and reducing racial and ethnic disparities in vaccination uptake.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Programas Obligatorios , Vacunación , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Ciudad de Nueva York , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano
6.
BMC Oral Health ; 23(1): 152, 2023 03 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36922767

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study came to determine the prevalence of Early Childhood Carries (ECC) among preschoolers in a marginalized population and describe the influence of behavioral and social determinants on the development of ECC. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study that was carried out in four random preschools in the Jerusalem Governorate of the Occupied Palestinian Territories. All children aged 3-5 years old in the selected schools were screened for ECC using the decayed, missing, and filled teeth index (dmft). Data on children's socio-economic, feeding habits, hygiene habits, access to care, parental level of stress, social support, and locus of control were collected by a validated questionnaire sent to the children's main caregivers. Descriptive statistics were generated and bivariable and multivariable analyses were used to explain the influence of different behavioral and social determinants on ECC levels. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty-seven preschoolers completed the questionnaire and the clinical screening. Ninety-seven percent (n = 447) had experienced dental decay, with an average dmft score of 6.6 ± 4.3. After accounting for potential confounding, parents' internal locus of control was associated with lower dental caries among children (IRR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.97, 0.98). Having routine, preventive visits versus never seeing a dentist were associated with lower dmft scores (IRR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.33, 0.52). Night feeding habits (putting things other than water in the baby bottle at night, having children sleep while being breastfed at night) were positively associated with children's dental caries (IRR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.09: IRR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.03, 1.29, respectively). Not adding sugar to the bottle was negatively associated with children's dental caries (IRR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.74, 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Preschoolers in this study suffered from high dental caries experience. Although infant feeding habits were key factors in explaining the elevated level of the disease, system and socio-psychological factors were also detrimental to ECC prevalence. Policies and interventions to alleviate the burden of ECC need to address socioeconomic determinants of health in addition to feeding and hygiene practices.


Asunto(s)
Caries Dental , Niño , Femenino , Lactante , Humanos , Preescolar , Caries Dental/epidemiología , Caries Dental/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Árabes , Susceptibilidad a Caries Dentarias , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Prevalencia
7.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1050511, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36741955

RESUMEN

Background/aim: Limited research has been conducted regarding the association between mental illness and dental caries. We studied the impact of emotional distress on current and new dental caries among low-income African-American caregivers in Detroit, Michigan and if this association was mediated by poor oral hygiene and sugar consumption and modified by a chronic health condition. Methods: Data came from Detroit Dental Health Project, a prospective cohort study of low-income African American caregivers and their children. We focused on baseline (n = 1,021) and 4-year follow-up participants (n = 614). Dental caries were assessed using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System. The study outcomes included two baseline caries outcomes (counts of non-cavitated lesions, baseline counts of cavitated lesions) and two outcomes of new caries over 4 years (new cavitated lesions and new non-cavitated lesions). The exposure was emotional distress. We performed multivariable quasi-Poisson regression analysis to test the association between emotional distress and caries. We tested effect modification by stratifying data by chronic health conditions and performed causal mediation analysis to test an indirect effect of oral hygiene and sugar consumption. Results: Ninety six percent of the caregivers were female, and their average age was 28 years old. Thirteen percent reported emotional distress at baseline. After accounting for potential confounding, emotional distress was positively associated with cavitated lesions at baseline (IRR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.08, 1.70). Among those with a chronic health condition, stronger association was observed (IRR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.27, 2.35). After 4 years, those with emotional distress and chronic health conditions had an increased risk of developing non-cavitated carious lesions (IRR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.88). Poor oral hygiene explained 51% of the association between emotional distress and baseline cavitated lesions (natural indirect effect = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.33), but there was no evidence for an indirect effect of sugar consumption. Conclusion: In this group of young, African-American caregivers with low socioeconomic status, dental caries was associated with emotional distress. This association was explained by poor oral hygiene and strengthened among those who reported a chronic health condition.


Asunto(s)
Caries Dental , Distrés Psicológico , Niño , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Negro o Afroamericano , Michigan/epidemiología , Cuidadores , Caries Dental/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Azúcares de la Dieta
8.
Eval Program Plann ; 97: 102245, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36764060

RESUMEN

In 2005, the city and state of New York launched New York/New York III (NY/NY III), a permanent supportive housing program for individuals experiencing homelessness or at risk of homelessness with complex medical and behavioral health issues. This review paper summarizes a decade of findings (2007-2017) from the NY/NY III evaluation team, to analyze this program's impact on various housing and health outcomes. The evaluation team linked NY/NY III eligible persons with administrative data from two years pre- and two years post-eligibility and compared housing and health outcomes between placed and unplaced groups using propensity score analysis. Placement into NY/NY III housing was associated with improved physical and mental health outcomes, increased housing stability, and statistically significant cost savings per person after one year of placement. The evaluation team recommends that municipalities invest in supportive housing as a means for mitigating homelessness and improving health outcomes in this vulnerable population.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Mala Vivienda , Trastornos Mentales , Humanos , Vivienda Popular , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , New York , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Vivienda
9.
J Infect Dis ; 227(4): 533-542, 2023 02 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36626187

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence is accumulating of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine effectiveness among persons with prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. METHODS: We evaluated the effect against incident SARS-CoV-2 infection of (1) prior infection without vaccination, (2) vaccination (2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine) without prior infection, and (3) vaccination after prior infection, all compared with unvaccinated persons without prior infection. We included long-term care facility staff in New York City aged <65 years with weekly SARS-CoV-2 testing from 21 January to 5 June 2021. Test results were obtained from state-mandated laboratory reporting. Vaccination status was obtained from the Citywide Immunization Registry. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for confounding with inverse probability of treatment weights. RESULTS: Compared with unvaccinated persons without prior infection, incident SARS-CoV-2 infection risk was lower in all groups: 54.6% (95% confidence interval, 38.0%-66.8%) lower among unvaccinated, previously infected persons; 80.0% (67.6%-87.7%) lower among fully vaccinated persons without prior infection; and 82.4% (70.8%-89.3%) lower among persons fully vaccinated after prior infection. CONCLUSIONS: Two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection risk by ≥80% and, for those with prior infection, increased protection from prior infection alone. These findings support recommendations that all eligible persons, regardless of prior infection, be vaccinated against COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacuna BNT162 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Casas de Salud
10.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 1804, 2023 Jan 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36721003

RESUMEN

To achieve a sustainable human presence on the Moon, it is critical to develop technologies utilising the local resources (a.k.a. in-situ resource utilisation or ISRU) for construction and resource extraction. In this study, we investigate the viability of microwave heating of two lunar soil simulants (JSC-1A and OPRH3N) under vacuum conditions, to simulate a lunar surface environment compared to previous studies performed at atmospheric pressure. All simulants are thermally treated in a bespoke 2.45 GHz microwave apparatus using three input powers: 1000 W, 600 W and 250 W. The microstructures and mechanical properties of the microwaved samples are analysed to identify their potential applications. Our key findings are: (i) higher input powers generate materials in shorter fabrication times with higher mechanical strengths and higher yields despite the same total energy input; (ii) the microstructures of the microwaved samples under vacuum are very different from those under atmospheric conditions due to the widespread vesicles/bubbles; and (iii) different heating rates caused by different input powers can be utilised for specific ISRU purposes: higher input powers for extra-terrestrial construction and lower input powers for resource extraction. Findings from this study have significant implications for developing a microwave-heating payload for lunar ISRU demonstration missions.

11.
Addiction ; 118(3): 459-467, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36305669

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Opioid overdose is a leading cause of death during the immediate time after release from jail or prison. Most jails in the United States do not provide methadone and buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder (MOUD), and research in estimating its impact in jail settings is limited. We aimed to test the hypothesis that in-jail MOUD is associated with lower overdose mortality risk post-release. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective, observational cohort study of 15 797 adults with opioid use disorder who were released from New York City jails to the community in 2011-2017. They experienced 31 382 incarcerations and were followed up to 1 year. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcomes were death caused by accidental drug poisoning and all-cause death. The exposure was receipt of MOUD (17 119 events) versus out-of-treatment (14 263 events) during the last 3 days before community re-entry. Covariates included demographic, clinical, behavioral, housing, health-care utilization and legal characteristics variables. We performed a multivariable, mixed-effect Cox regression analysis to test association between in-jail MOUD and deaths. FINDINGS: The majority were male (82%) and their average age was 42 years. Receiving MOUD was associated with misdemeanor charges, being female, injection drug use and homelessness. During 1 year post-release, 111 overdose deaths occurred and crude death rates were 0.49 and 0.83 per 100 person-years for in-jail MOUD and out-of-treatment groups, respectively. Accounting for confounding and random effects, in-jail MOUD was associated with lower overdose mortality risk [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.08-0.46] and all-cause mortality risk (aHR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.11-0.42) for the first month post-release. CONCLUSIONS: Methadone and buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder during incarceration was associated with an 80% reduction in overdose mortality risk for the first month post-release.


Asunto(s)
Buprenorfina , Sobredosis de Droga , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Cárceles Locales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/terapia , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico
12.
Child Care Health Dev ; 49(1): 119-129, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35733292

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Compliance with the requirements of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in the United States is monitored through review of cross-sectional reports from three discrete, age-defined programmes (early intervention [EI], early childhood special education [ECSE)] and school-age special education [SE]) to promote the timely, efficient and effective delivery of appropriate services to all eligible children. Analysis of longitudinal data is required to discern how children use services across programmes to provide the necessary context for IDEA oversight and to identify areas for programme or policy interventions to reduce barriers to service use and promote equity. METHODS: We applied sequence analysis to a data linkage across five public record systems among 15 626 New York City children born in 1998 who had records from birth through third grade. RESULTS: Five predominant patterns of service use were identified: (1) multiple therapies across EI/ECSE/SE (13%), (2) EI without transition to Department of Education schools or services (24%), (3) EI and intermittent ECSE/SE (16%), (4) older entry into EI and both speech and occupational therapy throughout ECSE/SE (9%) and (5) limited EI use and mostly speech therapy in ECSE/SE (38%). Each pattern had distinct demographics (e.g., pattern 2 was disproportionately White and from low poverty neighbourhoods; pattern 4 was disproportionately male and Black; pattern 5 was disproportionately Latino) and academic outcomes (e.g., pattern 1 had largest proportion in a SE school and not tested in third grade; pattern 3 had third grade tests scores that were similar to overall citywide mean scores). CONCLUSIONS: The differences in demographic profiles across the five patterns of service use illustrate the systemic inequities in the delivery of these important services. Delayed entry and limited use of EI services among children of colour underscore the need for equity goals to increase early referral and optimize service use.


Asunto(s)
Intervención Educativa Precoz , Educación Especial , Preescolar , Niño , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Color , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología
13.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(3): e469-e476, 2023 02 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35594552

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Belief that vaccination is not needed for individuals with prior infection contributes to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy. Among individuals infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) before vaccines became available, we determined whether vaccinated individuals had reduced odds of reinfection. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study among adult New York City residents who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020 and had not died or tested positive again >90 days after an initial positive test as of 1 July 2021. Case patients with reinfection during July 2021-November 2021 and controls with no reinfection were matched (1:3) on age, sex, timing of initial positive test in 2020, and neighborhood poverty level. Matched odds ratios (mORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 349 827 eligible adults, 2583 were reinfected during July 2021-November 2021. Of 2401 with complete matching criteria data, 1102 (45.9%) were known to be symptomatic for COVID-19-like illness, and 96 (4.0%) were hospitalized. Unvaccinated individuals, compared with individuals fully vaccinated within the prior 90 days, had elevated odds of reinfection (mOR, 3.21; 95% CI, 2.70 to 3.82), of symptomatic reinfection (mOR, 2.97; 95% CI, 2.31 to 3.83), and of reinfection with hospitalization (mOR, 2.09; 95% CI, .91 to 4.79). CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination reduced odds of reinfections when the Delta variant predominated. Further studies should assess risk of severe outcomes among reinfected persons as new variants emerge, infection- and vaccine-induced immunity wanes, and booster doses are administered.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Vacunación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Reinfección
14.
J Infect Dis ; 226(Suppl 3): S363-S371, 2022 10 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36208165

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection disproportionately impacts people experiencing homelessness. Hepatitis C virus can lead to negative health outcomes, including mortality. We evaluated the impact of a permanent supportive housing (PSH) program (ie, "treatment") on liver-related morbidity and mortality among persons with chronic homelessness and HCV infection. METHODS: We matched records for persons eligible for a New York City PSH program (2007-2014) with Heath Department HCV and Vital Statistics registries and Medicaid claims. Among persons diagnosed with HCV before or 2 years posteligibility, we added stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights to negative binomial regression models to compare rates for liver disease-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations, and hazard ratios for mortality, by program placement 2 and 5 years posteligibility. RESULTS: We identified 1158 of 8783 placed and 1952 of 19 019 unplaced persons with laboratory-confirmed HCV infection. Permanent supportive housing placement was associated with significantly reduced liver-related emergency department visits (adjusted rate ratio [aRR] = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .61-.95), hospitalizations (aRR = 0.62, 95% CI = .54-.71), and all-cause (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.65, 95% CI = .46-.92) and liver-related mortality (aHR = 0.72, 95% CI = .09-.83) within 2 years. The reduction remained significant for hospitalizations after 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Placement into PSH was associated with reduced liver-related morbidity and mortality among persons with HCV infection and chronic homelessness.


Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C , Personas con Mala Vivienda , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C/complicaciones , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Humanos , Vivienda Popular
15.
Prev Med ; 164: 107287, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36208819

RESUMEN

Black and Latino populations have been disproportionately burdened by COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. Subsidized housing, crowding, and neighborhood poverty might be associated with increased COVID-19 transmission and play a role in observed racial and ethnic disparities, yet research is limited. Our study investigated whether these housing variables mediate the relationship between race and ethnicity and SARS-CoV-2 antibody seropositivity among New York City (NYC) adults. We analyzed data from a SARS-CoV-2 serosurvey (n = 1074), nested within the 2020 cross-sectional NYC Community Health Survey (June-October 2020). We defined SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity as either a positive blood test for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies or a self-reported positive test result. We used causal mediation analyses to test whether subsidized housing, crowding, and neighborhood poverty mediate a relationship between race and ethnicity and seropositivity. After controlling for potential confounding, we found elevated prevalence ratios of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among Black (APR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.10-2.73) and Latino (APR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.05-2.37) residents compared with White residents and for those living in crowded housing (APR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.03-2.12) and high-poverty neighborhoods (APR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.12-2.11) but not for subsidized housing. We observed statistically significant natural direct effects for all three mediators. While living in crowded housing and high-poverty neighborhoods contributed to racial and ethnic disparities in seropositivity the estimated contribution from living in subsidized housing was -9% (Black) and - 14% (Latino). Our findings revealed racial and ethnic disparities in seropositivity of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among NYC adults. Unlike crowding and neighborhood poverty, living in subsidized housing did not explain racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Etnicidad , Adulto , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Vivienda , Estudios Transversales
16.
Ethn Dis ; 32(2): 123-130, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35497392

RESUMEN

Objectives: To examine racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19-like illness (CLI) during March - August 2020 in New York City, and to test effect modification by age, nativity, and working from home vs outside the home, and mediation via social distancing behavior. Design: Analysis of the monthly Community Health Survey datasets. Setting: New York City. Participants: 5,305 adults living in New York City. Main Outcome Measures: A binary indicator of having new onset of CLI in the past 30 days. Methods: Prevalence of having CLI was compared among racial and ethnic groups using multivariable log-linear regression. Stratified and causal mediation analyses were conducted to test effect modification and mediation, respectively. Results: Overall percentage of CLI decreased from 25% during March-May to 14% during June-August. In both periods, there was no increased prevalence of CLI among Black or Latino New Yorkers compared with White New Yorkers. However, in stratified analyses, Latino vs White New Yorkers had 2.05 times (95%CI=1.09, 3.83) higher prevalence of CLI among adults working outside the home. Mediation via social distancing was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Excess burden of CLI among Latino adults working outside the home underscores inequitable impacts of COVID-19 in New York City.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Distanciamiento Físico , Adulto , Etnicidad , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Grupos Raciales
17.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 22(1): 91, 2022 04 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35387655

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: State cancer prevention and control programs rely on public health surveillance data to set objectives to improve cancer prevention and control, plan interventions, and evaluate state-level progress towards achieving those objectives. The goal of this project was to evaluate the validity of using electronic health records (EHRs) based on common data model variables to generate indicators for surveillance of cancer prevention and control for these public health programs. METHODS: Following the methodological guidance from the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews, we conducted a literature scoping review to assess how EHRs are used to inform cancer surveillance. We then developed 26 indicators along the continuum of the cascade of care, including cancer risk factors, immunizations to prevent cancer, cancer screenings, quality of initial care after abnormal screening results, and cancer burden. Indicators were calculated within a sample of patients from the New York City (NYC) INSIGHT Clinical Research Network using common data model EHR data and were weighted to the NYC population using post-stratification. We used prevalence ratios to compare these estimates to estimates from the raw EHR of NYU Langone Health to assess quality of information within INSIGHT, and we compared estimates to results from existing surveillance sources to assess validity. RESULTS: Of the 401 identified articles, 15% had a study purpose related to surveillance. Our indicator comparisons found that INSIGHT EHR-based measures for risk factor indicators were similar to estimates from external sources. In contrast, cancer screening and vaccination indicators were substantially underestimated as compared to estimates from external sources. Cancer screenings and vaccinations were often recorded in sections of the EHR that were not captured by the common data model. INSIGHT estimates for many quality-of-care indicators were higher than those calculated using a raw EHR. CONCLUSION: Common data model EHR data can provide rich information for certain indicators related to the cascade of care but may have substantial biases for others that limit their use in informing surveillance efforts for cancer prevention and control programs.


Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Neoplasias , Humanos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Prevalencia , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Factores de Riesgo
18.
JAMA Pediatr ; 176(5): 478-485, 2022 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35254399

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Research has shown that early intervention programs can improve academic outcomes of children with developmental delays. It has been suggested that similar programs may combat the deleterious effects of lead on children's neurodevelopment. However, to our knowledge, there are no published studies examining this possibility. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate the association between receipt of early intervention services and third-grade standardized test scores among children exposed to lead before age 3 years. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cohort study including children born in New York City, New York, from 1994 to 1998 within an administrative data linkage of birth, lead monitoring, early intervention, and education data systems. Participants had a blood lead level of 4 µg/dL or greater at any point before age 3 years and later attended public school in New York City. EXPOSURES: Any use of early intervention services from birth through age 3 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Children who did or did not receive early intervention services were matched using propensity scores. Linear and log-binomial regression were used to estimate the association between receipt of early intervention services before age 3 years and standardized test scores in math and English-language arts in third grade. RESULTS: There were 2986 children exposed to lead who received early intervention services before age 36 months. Of these children, 2757 were propensity score-matched to 8160 children who did not receive services. Children who received early intervention services did 7% (95% CI, 3%-12%) of an SD better on math and 10% (95% CI, 5%-14%) of an SD better on English-language arts tests than children who did not receive services. In addition, children who received services were 14% (95% CI, 9%-19%) and 16% (95% CI, 9%-23%) more likely to meet test-based standards in math and English-language arts, respectively, than children who did not receive services. These associations became larger in magnitude when analyses were restricted to children with higher blood lead levels. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: By leveraging existing public health data, this study found evidence that receipt of early intervention services may benefit the academic performance of children exposed to lead early in life.


Asunto(s)
Intervención Educativa Precoz , Plomo , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Instituciones Académicas
19.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 28(1): E109-E118, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32487918

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Disease burden may vary substantively across neighborhoods in an urban setting. Yet, data available for monitoring chronic conditions at the neighborhood level are scarce. Large health care data sets have potential to complement population health surveillance. Few studies have examined the utility of health care data for neighborhood-level surveillance. OBJECTIVE: We examined the use of primary care electronic health records (EHRs) and emergency department (ED) claims for identifying neighborhoods with higher chronic disease burden and neighborhood-level prevalence estimation. DESIGN: Comparison of hypertension and diabetes estimates from EHRs and ED claims with survey-based estimates. SETTING: Forty-two United Hospital Fund neighborhoods in New York City. PARTICIPANTS: The EHR sample comprised 708 452 patients from the Hub Population Health System (the Hub) in 2015, and the ED claim sample comprised 1 567 870 patients from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System in 2015. We derived survey-based estimates from 2012 to 2016 Community Health Survey (n = 44 189). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: We calculated hypertension and diabetes prevalence estimates by neighborhood from each data source. We obtained Pearson correlation and absolute difference between EHR-based or claims-based estimates and survey-based estimates. RESULTS: Both EHR-based and claims-based estimates correlated strongly with survey-based estimates for hypertension (0.91 and 0.72, respectively) and diabetes (0.83 and 0.82, respectively) and identified similar neighborhoods of higher burden. For hypertension, 10 and 17 neighborhoods from the EHRs and ED claims, respectively, had an absolute difference of more than 5 percentage points from the survey-based estimate. For diabetes, 15 and 4 neighborhoods from the EHRs and ED claims, respectively, differed from the survey-based estimate by more than 5 percentage points. CONCLUSIONS: Both EHRs and ED claims data are useful for identifying neighborhoods with greater disease burden and have potential for monitoring chronic conditions at the neighborhood level.


Asunto(s)
Indicadores de Enfermedades Crónicas , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Características de la Residencia
20.
AIDS Care ; 34(5): 647-654, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33729059

RESUMEN

The relationship between HIV patient caseload and a clinic's ability to achieve viral load suppression (VLS) in their HIV patient population is not understood. The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (NYCDOHMH) administered a survey to clinics providing HIV care to people living with HIV (PLWH) in NYC in 2016. Clinics were stratified by quartiles of HIV patient caseload and dichotomized by whether ≥85% (n = 36) or <85% (n = 74) of their patients achieved VLS. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for confounders of age, sex, ethnicity, and race. Provider to patient ratios (PPR) were calculated for each clinic as staffing full time equivalents per 100 HIV patients.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Pruebas Serológicas , Carga Viral
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...